![]() ![]() ![]() Understanding the conditions, short of capitulation, in which a conflict might be brought to a conclusion will prove critical to managing escalation. policymakers seeking to craft the optimal strategy while possibly creating further ambiguity for those seeking to craft a response in Beijing.Įven as the literature on a potential U.S.-Chinese conflict grows, topics such as proactive conflict termination and alliance dynamics remain understudied. Recognizing these schools can help sharpen the debate between them. Adherents of the “indirect approach” favor a variety of peripheral strategies to frustrate Chinese aims, hold assets at risk, or apply pressure through various means outside of the main theater of operations. forces to contribute directly to the conflict. Those in the “direct approach” camp favor penetration of anti-access/area denial systems to enable U.S. Two major schools of prescriptive thought have evolved on how to respond in case of Chinese aggression in the Western Pacific. Highlighting and addressing these points will help the United States better meet the challenge it faces in the Indo-Pacific. ![]() Unsurprisingly, though, there remain noteworthy disagreements, gaps, and unquestioned assumptions within this vast body of research. Think tanks, scholars, and military institutions have weighed in, contributing valuable insights. defense community has produced a tremendous volume of analytical work on the military balance between the United States and China. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |